Agenda-setting: mídia e opinião pública na dinâmica de políticas públicas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21878/compolitica.2018.8.1.236Keywords:
agenda-setting, agenda de políticas públicas, formação de agenda, agenda governamental, estudos de agendaAbstract
Como uma questão se insere na agenda governamental, levando o governo a desenvolver
políticas para lidar com um problema específico? Dada a grande quantidade de
acontecimentos, fatos e problemas existentes no dia a dia e que mereceriam atenção dos
atores governamentais, de que forma alguns temas são priorizados em detrimento de outros?
Essas são algumas das questões enfrentadas pelos pesquisadores que se dedicam a estudar
o processo de formação da agenda governamental. O objetivo do presente estudo consiste
em recuperar o histórico desses estudos sobre agenda, com base nas três tradições de
pesquisa da agenda identificadas por Dearing e Rogers (1996). Em especial, procuramos
discutir as conexões entre as pesquisas conduzidas no campo de políticas públicas, que têm
como foco a agenda governamental, e as relacionadas à tradição da comunicação política.
Entendemos que ambas tradições não apenas registram questões teóricas e metodológicas
em comum, mas podem se beneficiar de uma aproximação.
References
BAUMGARTNER, Frank R.; JONES, Bryan D. Agendas and Instability in American Politics.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.
_______________. The Politics of Information: problem definition and the course of public
policy in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.
BAUMGARTNER, Frank R.; GREEN-PEDERSEN, Christoffer; JONES, Bryan D. Comparative
Studies of Policy Agendas. Journal of European Public Policy, v. 13, n. 7, p. 959-974, 2006.
BAUMGARTNER, Frank R; JONES, Bryan D.; WILKERSON, John D. Studying Policy
Dynamics. In: Baumgartner, F.R. e Jones, B.D. (eds.). Policy Dynamics. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press, 2002.
BINDERKRANTZ, Anne; GREEN-PEDERSEN, Christoffer. Policy or Process in Focus?
Framing in the News Media. International Journal of Press/Politics, 2009.
CAIRNEY, Paul; JONES, Michael D. Kingdon´s Multiple Streams Approach: What is the
empirical impact of this universal theory?. Policy Studies Journal, jun. 2015. Disponível em
<http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/psj.12111/abstract> . Acesso em 14/05/2016.
CAPELLA, Ana C. N. Perspectivas teóricas sobre o processo de formulação de políticas
públicas”. In Hochman, G.; Arretche, M; Marques, E. (orgs.). Políticas Públicas no Brasil. Rio de
Janeiro: Fiocruz, 2007.
CHAQUÉS-BONAFONT, L.; et al. The interaction between media coverage and parliamentary
questions: A crossnational comparison. 20th International Conference of Europeanists, Council
for European Studies (CES), Amsterdã, jun. 2013.
COBB, Roger, W.; ELDER, Charles D. The Politics of Agenda-Building: An Alternative
Perspective for Modern Democratic Theory. Journal of Politics. v. 33, n. 4., 1971.
___________________. Participation in American Politics: The dynamics of agenda building.
Boston: Allyn and Bancon, 1972.
COBB, Roger W.; Ross, Jennie-Keith; ROSS, Marc.H. “Agenda Building as a comparative
political process”. American Political Science Review, v. 70, n. 1, p. 126-138, 1976.
COHEN, B. C. The press and foreign policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1963.
DEARING, James W. e ROGERS, Everett M. Agenda-Setting. Thousand Oaks, SAGE, 1996.
DRISCOLL, A; HARLOW, S; et al.. Public Opinion, Media Agenda Setting and Individual
Legislative Responsiveness in Florida. IN: CAP Annual Meeting, Lisboa, Portugal, 22 a 24 de
jun. 2015.
FESTINGER, L. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1957.
GREEN-PEDERSEN, Christoffer; STUBAGER, Rune. The Political Conditionality of Mass
Media. When do Parties Follow Mass Media Attention? British Journal of Political Science, v.
40, n. 03, 2010.
JENNINGS, Will. “Project Report on Punctuations in British Governing Agendas”. [s.l.], 2011.
Disponível em
<https://policyagendasuk.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/jenningspunctuations1.pdf>. Acesso em
abr. 2016.
JOHN, Peter. Is There Life After Policy Streams, Advocacy Coalitions, and Punctuations: Using
Evolutionary Theory to Explain Policy Change?. Policy Studies Journal, v. 31, n 4, 2003.
__________. The Policy Agendas Project: A Review. Journal of European Public Policy, v. 13,
n. 7, p. 975-986, 2006a.
_________. Explaining policy change: the impact of the media, public opinion and political
violence on urban budgets in England. Journal of European Public Policy, v. 13, n.7, p. 1053-
1068, 2006b.
__________. New directions in public policy: theories of policy change and variation
reconsidered. Trabalho apresentado no International Conference on Public Policy. Grenoble,
jun, 2013. Disponível em: http://www.icpublicpolicy.org/IMG/pdf/panel_84_1_peter_john.pdf.
Acesso em: set. 2015.
JONES, Bryan D.; BAUMGARTNER, Frank R. The Politics of Attention: How government
priorizes problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.
JONES, Bryan D.. From Here to There: Punctuated Equilibrium to the General Punctuation
Thesis to a Theory of Government Information Processing. Policy Studies Journal, v. 40, n. 1,
pp. 01-19, 2012.
KING, A.; WYBROW, R. British Political Opinion 1937-2000. Londres: Politico’s Publishing,
2001.
KINGDON, John. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. 2a. Ed. New York: Longman,
2003.
KLAPPER, Joseph T.. The Effects of Mass Communication. Glencoe, Ill: Free Press, 1960.
LAZARSFELD, Paul F.; BERELSON, Bernard; GAUDET, Hazel. The People's Choice: How the
Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Duell, Sloan & Pearce, 1944.
LIPPMANN, Walter. Public Opinion. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1922.
MANGIALAVORI, Leonardo. Revisitando os estudos de agenda-setting, 40 anos depois.
Revista Brasileira de Informação Bibliográfica em Ciências Sociais (BIB), n. 74, p.27-42, 2014.
McCOMBS, M.; SHAW, D. The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion
Quarterly, v. 36, p. 176-195, 1972.
McCOMBS, M., VALENZUELA, S. The continuing expansion of agenda-setting theory: Towards
a new frontier of research questions. Handbook of Political Communication Theories. New York:
Oxford University Press, 2007,
RENS, Vliegenthart; WALGRAVE, Stefaan. Médias et parlement Les conditions de l’effet des
médias sur l’agenda parlementaire belge. Revue Internationale de Politique Comparée. Vol. 16,
p. 423-440, 2009
SOROKA, S. Agenda-Setting Dynamics in Canada. Vancouver, Canadá: UBC Press, 2002.
SOROKA, S.; WLEZIEN, C. Opinion-policy dynamics: public preferences and public expenditure
in the United Kingdom. British Journal of Political Science, v.35, n.4, p. 665-690, 2005.
TRAQUINA, Nelson. O paradigma do agenda-setting: Redescoberta do poder do jornalismo.
Revista Comunicação e Linguagens. Vol. 21-22, p. 299-318. Lisboa: Edições Cosmos, 1995.
WALGRAVE, Stefaan. Again the almighty mass media. A subjective assessment of the media’s
political agenda-setting power by politicians and journalists in Belgium. Political Communication,
v. 25, n. 4, p. 445-459, 2008a.
WALGRAVE, S.; SOROKA, S.N, NUYTEMANS, M. The mass media's political agenda-setting
power. A longitudinal analysis of media, parliament, and government in Belgium (1993-2000).
Comparative Political Studies, v. 41, n. 6, p. 814-836, 2008b.
WOLF, Mauro. Teorias da comunicação. Lisboa: Presença, 1986.
WOLFE, Michelle; Jones, Brian D. e Baumgartner, Frank R. A failure to communicate: agenda
setting in media and policy studies. Political Communication, v.30, n.2, p. 175-192, 2013.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.
_______________. The Politics of Information: problem definition and the course of public
policy in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.
BAUMGARTNER, Frank R.; GREEN-PEDERSEN, Christoffer; JONES, Bryan D. Comparative
Studies of Policy Agendas. Journal of European Public Policy, v. 13, n. 7, p. 959-974, 2006.
BAUMGARTNER, Frank R; JONES, Bryan D.; WILKERSON, John D. Studying Policy
Dynamics. In: Baumgartner, F.R. e Jones, B.D. (eds.). Policy Dynamics. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press, 2002.
BINDERKRANTZ, Anne; GREEN-PEDERSEN, Christoffer. Policy or Process in Focus?
Framing in the News Media. International Journal of Press/Politics, 2009.
CAIRNEY, Paul; JONES, Michael D. Kingdon´s Multiple Streams Approach: What is the
empirical impact of this universal theory?. Policy Studies Journal, jun. 2015. Disponível em
<http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/psj.12111/abstract> . Acesso em 14/05/2016.
CAPELLA, Ana C. N. Perspectivas teóricas sobre o processo de formulação de políticas
públicas”. In Hochman, G.; Arretche, M; Marques, E. (orgs.). Políticas Públicas no Brasil. Rio de
Janeiro: Fiocruz, 2007.
CHAQUÉS-BONAFONT, L.; et al. The interaction between media coverage and parliamentary
questions: A crossnational comparison. 20th International Conference of Europeanists, Council
for European Studies (CES), Amsterdã, jun. 2013.
COBB, Roger, W.; ELDER, Charles D. The Politics of Agenda-Building: An Alternative
Perspective for Modern Democratic Theory. Journal of Politics. v. 33, n. 4., 1971.
___________________. Participation in American Politics: The dynamics of agenda building.
Boston: Allyn and Bancon, 1972.
COBB, Roger W.; Ross, Jennie-Keith; ROSS, Marc.H. “Agenda Building as a comparative
political process”. American Political Science Review, v. 70, n. 1, p. 126-138, 1976.
COHEN, B. C. The press and foreign policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1963.
DEARING, James W. e ROGERS, Everett M. Agenda-Setting. Thousand Oaks, SAGE, 1996.
DRISCOLL, A; HARLOW, S; et al.. Public Opinion, Media Agenda Setting and Individual
Legislative Responsiveness in Florida. IN: CAP Annual Meeting, Lisboa, Portugal, 22 a 24 de
jun. 2015.
FESTINGER, L. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1957.
GREEN-PEDERSEN, Christoffer; STUBAGER, Rune. The Political Conditionality of Mass
Media. When do Parties Follow Mass Media Attention? British Journal of Political Science, v.
40, n. 03, 2010.
JENNINGS, Will. “Project Report on Punctuations in British Governing Agendas”. [s.l.], 2011.
Disponível em
<https://policyagendasuk.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/jenningspunctuations1.pdf>. Acesso em
abr. 2016.
JOHN, Peter. Is There Life After Policy Streams, Advocacy Coalitions, and Punctuations: Using
Evolutionary Theory to Explain Policy Change?. Policy Studies Journal, v. 31, n 4, 2003.
__________. The Policy Agendas Project: A Review. Journal of European Public Policy, v. 13,
n. 7, p. 975-986, 2006a.
_________. Explaining policy change: the impact of the media, public opinion and political
violence on urban budgets in England. Journal of European Public Policy, v. 13, n.7, p. 1053-
1068, 2006b.
__________. New directions in public policy: theories of policy change and variation
reconsidered. Trabalho apresentado no International Conference on Public Policy. Grenoble,
jun, 2013. Disponível em: http://www.icpublicpolicy.org/IMG/pdf/panel_84_1_peter_john.pdf.
Acesso em: set. 2015.
JONES, Bryan D.; BAUMGARTNER, Frank R. The Politics of Attention: How government
priorizes problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.
JONES, Bryan D.. From Here to There: Punctuated Equilibrium to the General Punctuation
Thesis to a Theory of Government Information Processing. Policy Studies Journal, v. 40, n. 1,
pp. 01-19, 2012.
KING, A.; WYBROW, R. British Political Opinion 1937-2000. Londres: Politico’s Publishing,
2001.
KINGDON, John. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. 2a. Ed. New York: Longman,
2003.
KLAPPER, Joseph T.. The Effects of Mass Communication. Glencoe, Ill: Free Press, 1960.
LAZARSFELD, Paul F.; BERELSON, Bernard; GAUDET, Hazel. The People's Choice: How the
Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Duell, Sloan & Pearce, 1944.
LIPPMANN, Walter. Public Opinion. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1922.
MANGIALAVORI, Leonardo. Revisitando os estudos de agenda-setting, 40 anos depois.
Revista Brasileira de Informação Bibliográfica em Ciências Sociais (BIB), n. 74, p.27-42, 2014.
McCOMBS, M.; SHAW, D. The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion
Quarterly, v. 36, p. 176-195, 1972.
McCOMBS, M., VALENZUELA, S. The continuing expansion of agenda-setting theory: Towards
a new frontier of research questions. Handbook of Political Communication Theories. New York:
Oxford University Press, 2007,
RENS, Vliegenthart; WALGRAVE, Stefaan. Médias et parlement Les conditions de l’effet des
médias sur l’agenda parlementaire belge. Revue Internationale de Politique Comparée. Vol. 16,
p. 423-440, 2009
SOROKA, S. Agenda-Setting Dynamics in Canada. Vancouver, Canadá: UBC Press, 2002.
SOROKA, S.; WLEZIEN, C. Opinion-policy dynamics: public preferences and public expenditure
in the United Kingdom. British Journal of Political Science, v.35, n.4, p. 665-690, 2005.
TRAQUINA, Nelson. O paradigma do agenda-setting: Redescoberta do poder do jornalismo.
Revista Comunicação e Linguagens. Vol. 21-22, p. 299-318. Lisboa: Edições Cosmos, 1995.
WALGRAVE, Stefaan. Again the almighty mass media. A subjective assessment of the media’s
political agenda-setting power by politicians and journalists in Belgium. Political Communication,
v. 25, n. 4, p. 445-459, 2008a.
WALGRAVE, S.; SOROKA, S.N, NUYTEMANS, M. The mass media's political agenda-setting
power. A longitudinal analysis of media, parliament, and government in Belgium (1993-2000).
Comparative Political Studies, v. 41, n. 6, p. 814-836, 2008b.
WOLF, Mauro. Teorias da comunicação. Lisboa: Presença, 1986.
WOLFE, Michelle; Jones, Brian D. e Baumgartner, Frank R. A failure to communicate: agenda
setting in media and policy studies. Political Communication, v.30, n.2, p. 175-192, 2013.
Downloads
Published
2018-08-12
How to Cite
Capella, A. C. N., & Brasil, F. G. (2018). Agenda-setting: mídia e opinião pública na dinâmica de políticas públicas. Compolítica, 8(1), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.21878/compolitica.2018.8.1.236
Issue
Section
Artigos
License
Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Creative Commons Attribution License que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria do trabalho e publicação inicial nesta revista.
