Evaluating the open data policy in the Brazilian Legislative
qualitative analysis of the Chamber of Deputies datasets
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21878/compolitica.2020.10.1.351Keywords:
open data, open government, open parliament, Chamber of DeputiesAbstract
This article presents a proposal for evaluating the open data policy, using the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies as a case study. In methodological terms, the work proposes the application of a set of indicators based on two fronts: (a) external qualitative analysis (about the information surrounding the publication) and (b) internal qualitative analysis (evaluating the functionality inside the files). The results demonstrate that the databases of the Chamber of Deputies have low occurrence of inoperative links; it presents good informative feedback, however, about the internal analysis of the archives, only about 12% of the resources evaluated were in excellent structure, without errors or dysfunctions.
References
ALMADA, M. P.; DOMINGUEZ, M. E-Transparência e dados abertos governamentais: o ambiente digital como lócus dos avanços do governo brasileiro nas políticas, leis e parcerias internacionais. Trabalho apresentado no VII Compolítica - Congresso da Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em Comunicação e Política. Porto Alegre, 2017.
ATTARD, J.; ORLANDI, F.; SCERRI, S.; AUER, S. A systematic review of open government data initiatives. Government Information Quarterly, v. 32, n. 4, 399-418, 2015.
BIRCHALL, C. Interrupting Transparency. In: ALLOA, Emmanuel & THOMÄ, Dieter (org). Transparency, Society and Subjectivity: Critical Perspectives. Cham: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2018.
CHUN, Soon Ae et al. Government 2.0: Making connections between citizens, data and government. Information Polity ,15, 1-9, 2010.
FARIA, C.; REHBEIN, M. Open parliament policy applied to the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 1-20, 2016.
HARCOURT, B. E. Virtual Transparency: From the Panopticon to the Expository Society and Beyond. In: ALLOA, Emmanuel & THOMÄ, Dieter (org). Transparency, Society and Subjectivity: Critical Perspectives. Cham: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2018.
JANSSEN, M.; CHARALABIDIS, Y.; ZUDERWIJK, A. Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government. Information Systems Management, 29 (4), 258-268, 2012.
MÁCHOVÁ, R.; LNENICKA, M. Evaluating the Quality of Open Data Portals on the National Level. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 12 (1), 21-41, 2017.
MANDELBAUM, A.; SWISLOW, D. Definiendo el Parlamento abierto. In: Vielba, I.R.; Gonzalo, M.A.; DOMÍNGUEZ, E. C. (Org.) Parlamentos abiertos a la sociedad: participación y monitorización. Madrid: Fundación Ideas, Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, 2013, p. 27-34.
MCDERMOTT, P. Building open government. Government. In: Information Quarterly, 27, 401–413, 2010.
MEIJER, A. J.; CURTIN, D.; HILLEBRANDT, M. Open government: connecting vision and voice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, v. 78, n. 1, 10–29, 2012.
MEIJER, A. J. Understanding the Complex Dynamics of Transparency. Public Administration Review, v. 73, n. 3, p. 429-439, 2013.
OECD. Government at a Glance 2017. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2017. Disponível em < http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/gov_glance-2017-en > Acesso. 03 julho 2018.
OECD. Open Government: The global context and the way forward 2016. Paris: OECD, 2016. Disponível em <http://www.oecd.org/gov/open-government.htm> Acesso. 03 julho 2018.
ONU (Organização das Nações Unidas). Guide on Lessons for Open Government Data Action Planning for Sustainable Development. Nova York: ONU, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2017. Disponível em <http://workspace.unpan.org/sites/Internet/Documents/UNPAN97913.pdf> acesso 13 de abril 2018.
POSSAMAI, A. J. Portal brasileiro de dados abertos: Novas práticas para o fortalecimento da democracia e da gestão pública na Era Digital. In: SILVA, S. P. da; BRAGATTO, R. C.; SAMPAIO, R. C. Democracia digital, comunicação política e redes: Teoria e prática. Rio de Janeiro: Letra e Imagem, 2016.
ROBERTS, A. Blacked Out: government secrecy in the information age. Nova York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
SAFAROV. I.; MEIJER, A.; GRIMMELIKHUIJSEN, S. Utilization of open government data: A systematic literature review of types, conditions, effects and users. Information Polity, v. 22, n.1, p. 1-24, 2017.
TUSIKOV, N. Transparency in the Post-Snowden Age of Mass State and Corporate Surveillance. State University of New York, Buffalo, 2015. Disponível em: https://www.academia.edu/10619820/Transparency_in_the_Post-Snowden_Age_of_Mass_State_and_Corporate_Surveillance consultado em 09/02/2020.
TYLER, C. Jeremy Bentham on open government and privacy. In: Journal of Information Ethics, v. 26, n.1, Spring, 2017, pg. 112-29. Disponível em https://www.academia.edu/36586027/Bentham_privacy_and_open_government_Open_Access_version.pdf consultado em 09/02/2020.
WIRTZA, B. W.; BIRKMEYERA, S. Open Government: Origin, Development, and Conceptual Perspectives. International Journal of Public Administration. 1–16, 2015.
YU, H.; ROBINSON, D. The New Ambiguity of “Open Government” In: UCLA Law Review Discourse, 2012. Disponível em https://www.uclalawreview.org/pdf/discourse/59-11.pdf consultado em 09/02/2020.
ATTARD, J.; ORLANDI, F.; SCERRI, S.; AUER, S. A systematic review of open government data initiatives. Government Information Quarterly, v. 32, n. 4, 399-418, 2015.
BIRCHALL, C. Interrupting Transparency. In: ALLOA, Emmanuel & THOMÄ, Dieter (org). Transparency, Society and Subjectivity: Critical Perspectives. Cham: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2018.
CHUN, Soon Ae et al. Government 2.0: Making connections between citizens, data and government. Information Polity ,15, 1-9, 2010.
FARIA, C.; REHBEIN, M. Open parliament policy applied to the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 1-20, 2016.
HARCOURT, B. E. Virtual Transparency: From the Panopticon to the Expository Society and Beyond. In: ALLOA, Emmanuel & THOMÄ, Dieter (org). Transparency, Society and Subjectivity: Critical Perspectives. Cham: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2018.
JANSSEN, M.; CHARALABIDIS, Y.; ZUDERWIJK, A. Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government. Information Systems Management, 29 (4), 258-268, 2012.
MÁCHOVÁ, R.; LNENICKA, M. Evaluating the Quality of Open Data Portals on the National Level. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 12 (1), 21-41, 2017.
MANDELBAUM, A.; SWISLOW, D. Definiendo el Parlamento abierto. In: Vielba, I.R.; Gonzalo, M.A.; DOMÍNGUEZ, E. C. (Org.) Parlamentos abiertos a la sociedad: participación y monitorización. Madrid: Fundación Ideas, Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, 2013, p. 27-34.
MCDERMOTT, P. Building open government. Government. In: Information Quarterly, 27, 401–413, 2010.
MEIJER, A. J.; CURTIN, D.; HILLEBRANDT, M. Open government: connecting vision and voice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, v. 78, n. 1, 10–29, 2012.
MEIJER, A. J. Understanding the Complex Dynamics of Transparency. Public Administration Review, v. 73, n. 3, p. 429-439, 2013.
OECD. Government at a Glance 2017. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2017. Disponível em < http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/gov_glance-2017-en > Acesso. 03 julho 2018.
OECD. Open Government: The global context and the way forward 2016. Paris: OECD, 2016. Disponível em <http://www.oecd.org/gov/open-government.htm> Acesso. 03 julho 2018.
ONU (Organização das Nações Unidas). Guide on Lessons for Open Government Data Action Planning for Sustainable Development. Nova York: ONU, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2017. Disponível em <http://workspace.unpan.org/sites/Internet/Documents/UNPAN97913.pdf> acesso 13 de abril 2018.
POSSAMAI, A. J. Portal brasileiro de dados abertos: Novas práticas para o fortalecimento da democracia e da gestão pública na Era Digital. In: SILVA, S. P. da; BRAGATTO, R. C.; SAMPAIO, R. C. Democracia digital, comunicação política e redes: Teoria e prática. Rio de Janeiro: Letra e Imagem, 2016.
ROBERTS, A. Blacked Out: government secrecy in the information age. Nova York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
SAFAROV. I.; MEIJER, A.; GRIMMELIKHUIJSEN, S. Utilization of open government data: A systematic literature review of types, conditions, effects and users. Information Polity, v. 22, n.1, p. 1-24, 2017.
TUSIKOV, N. Transparency in the Post-Snowden Age of Mass State and Corporate Surveillance. State University of New York, Buffalo, 2015. Disponível em: https://www.academia.edu/10619820/Transparency_in_the_Post-Snowden_Age_of_Mass_State_and_Corporate_Surveillance consultado em 09/02/2020.
TYLER, C. Jeremy Bentham on open government and privacy. In: Journal of Information Ethics, v. 26, n.1, Spring, 2017, pg. 112-29. Disponível em https://www.academia.edu/36586027/Bentham_privacy_and_open_government_Open_Access_version.pdf consultado em 09/02/2020.
WIRTZA, B. W.; BIRKMEYERA, S. Open Government: Origin, Development, and Conceptual Perspectives. International Journal of Public Administration. 1–16, 2015.
YU, H.; ROBINSON, D. The New Ambiguity of “Open Government” In: UCLA Law Review Discourse, 2012. Disponível em https://www.uclalawreview.org/pdf/discourse/59-11.pdf consultado em 09/02/2020.
Downloads
Published
2020-05-29
How to Cite
Silva, S. P. da, Santos, Ébida R. dos, Rabelo, L. E. M., & Luciano, M. S. F. (2020). Evaluating the open data policy in the Brazilian Legislative: qualitative analysis of the Chamber of Deputies datasets. Compolítica, 10(1), 137–160. https://doi.org/10.21878/compolitica.2020.10.1.351
Issue
Section
Artigos
License
Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Creative Commons Attribution License que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria do trabalho e publicação inicial nesta revista.
